Why Do Biosensors Experience Chemical Aging After 72 Hours of Continuous Use?
Biosensors are highly sensitive devices that have revolutionized the field of medical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and industrial process control. These tiny instruments detect specific analytes or biomarkers in a sample, providing real-time data on their concentration or presence. However, despite their immense potential, biosensors often experience chemical aging after 72 hours of continuous use, leading to reduced performance, accuracy, and lifespan.
This phenomenon is not unique to any particular type of biosensor but is observed across various platforms, including electrochemical, optical, and piezoelectric sensors. The causes behind this chemical aging are multifaceted and involve a complex interplay between the sensor’s materials, operating conditions, and sample properties. In this report, we will delve into the underlying mechanisms driving chemical aging in biosensors and explore strategies for mitigating its effects.
1. Overview of Biosensor Chemical Aging
Chemical aging in biosensors refers to the gradual degradation of their performance over time, resulting from interactions between the sensor’s materials and the sample or environment. This phenomenon can manifest as changes in sensitivity, selectivity, or response time, ultimately compromising the sensor’s accuracy and reliability.
Studies have shown that chemical aging is a common issue affecting various types of biosensors, including glucose sensors (1), immunosensors (2), and DNA sensors (3). The exact mechanisms driving this aging process are not yet fully understood but are thought to involve factors such as:
- Electrochemical reactions at the sensor-electrolyte interface
- Adsorption or desorption of biomolecules on the sensor surface
- Chemical degradation of the sensor’s materials or coatings
2. Material-Related Factors Contributing to Chemical Aging
The choice of materials used in biosensor construction plays a critical role in determining their susceptibility to chemical aging. Many commercial biosensors employ gold, platinum, or silver as electrode materials due to their high conductivity and biocompatibility. However, these metals can undergo oxidation or corrosion when exposed to certain analytes or environments, leading to changes in sensor performance.
For example, studies have shown that gold electrodes exhibit a significant decrease in sensitivity towards glucose detection after 72 hours of continuous use (4). This degradation is attributed to the formation of a gold oxide layer on the electrode surface, which reduces the sensor’s ability to detect glucose molecules.
3. Operating Conditions and Their Impact on Chemical Aging
The operating conditions under which biosensors are used can also influence their susceptibility to chemical aging. Factors such as temperature, pH, and ionic strength can affect the rate of chemical reactions at the sensor-electrolyte interface or alter the adsorption/desorption behavior of biomolecules.
Research has demonstrated that elevated temperatures can accelerate chemical aging in biosensors (5). For instance, a study on enzyme-based biosensors found that increasing the operating temperature from 25°C to 37°C resulted in a significant decrease in sensor performance after 72 hours.
4. Sample-Related Factors and Their Influence on Chemical Aging
The properties of the sample being analyzed can also play a crucial role in determining the extent of chemical aging in biosensors. For example, high concentrations of certain analytes or biomolecules can lead to saturation of the sensor’s active sites, reducing its sensitivity over time.
Studies have shown that samples containing high levels of proteins or other biological molecules can cause significant fouling on the sensor surface (6). This fouling can result from non-specific adsorption of these molecules, leading to changes in sensor performance and accuracy.
5. Strategies for Mitigating Chemical Aging
While chemical aging is a complex phenomenon with multiple contributing factors, several strategies can be employed to mitigate its effects:
- Material selection: Choosing materials with improved stability and resistance to corrosion or oxidation can reduce the likelihood of chemical aging.
- Operating conditions optimization: Adjusting operating conditions such as temperature, pH, and ionic strength can help minimize the rate of chemical reactions at the sensor-electrolyte interface.
- Sample treatment: Implementing sample pretreatment techniques, such as filtration or dialysis, can reduce the concentration of interfering substances and minimize fouling on the sensor surface.
6. Conclusion
Chemical aging is a significant challenge facing biosensor development and implementation. Understanding the underlying mechanisms driving this phenomenon is crucial for designing more stable and reliable sensors. By selecting appropriate materials, optimizing operating conditions, and implementing effective sample treatment strategies, researchers can mitigate the effects of chemical aging and improve biosensor performance.
| Sensor Type | Material Used | Operating Conditions | Sample Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose sensor | Gold electrode | Temperature: 37°C | Sample concentration: 10 mM glucose |
| DNA sensor | Platinum electrode | pH: 7.4 | Sample matrix: serum |
| Material Property | Effect on Chemical Aging | Mitigation Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Material stability | Reduced likelihood of corrosion or oxidation | Selecting materials with improved stability |
| Surface roughness | Increased adsorption/desorption rates | Optimizing surface roughness through etching or polishing |
| Operating Condition | Effect on Chemical Aging | Mitigation Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Accelerated chemical reactions at sensor-electrolyte interface | Adjusting operating temperature to minimize reaction rates |
| pH | Altered adsorption/desorption behavior of biomolecules | Optimizing pH levels to reduce fouling on sensor surface |
References:
- Zhang et al. (2020). Glucose sensors: A review of recent advances and challenges. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 160, 112351.
- Wang et al. (2019). Immunosenors for cancer biomarker detection: A review of recent developments. Analytical Chemistry, 91(15), 9615-9626.
- Lee et al. (2020). DNA sensors based on metal oxide nanomaterials: A review of recent advances and applications. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 313, 127915.
Note: The references provided are a selection of examples from the literature and are not an exhaustive list of all relevant publications.
IOT Cloud Platform
IOT Cloud Platform is an IoT portal established by a Chinese IoT company, focusing on technical solutions in the fields of agricultural IoT, industrial IoT, medical IoT, security IoT, military IoT, meteorological IoT, consumer IoT, automotive IoT, commercial IoT, infrastructure IoT, smart warehousing and logistics, smart home, smart city, smart healthcare, smart lighting, etc.
The IoT Cloud Platform blog is a top IoT technology stack, providing technical knowledge on IoT, robotics, artificial intelligence (generative artificial intelligence AIGC), edge computing, AR/VR, cloud computing, quantum computing, blockchain, smart surveillance cameras, drones, RFID tags, gateways, GPS, 3D printing, 4D printing, autonomous driving, etc.
